<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dora on Experiment, Fail, Learn, Repeat</title>
    <link>https://www.hairizuan.com/tags/dora/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Dora on Experiment, Fail, Learn, Repeat</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright © 2026 Hairizuan Noorazman</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 22:06:19 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.hairizuan.com/tags/dora/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>Measuring Coding Tool Effectiveness</title>
      <link>https://www.hairizuan.com/measuring-coding-tool-effectiveness/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.hairizuan.com/measuring-coding-tool-effectiveness/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most online content regarding AI coding tools focuses heavily on input and output token counts. While these metrics are useful for understanding the raw volume of data processed, they often fail to address the actual effectiveness of those tokens in solving real-world engineering problems. Measuring the true impact of these tools on development workflows remains a challenge because volume does not equate to value.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
